What is a many-to-many relationship in database modeling? How do you implement this relationship in a database? The examples in this article will answer these questions.
Many-to-many relationships are probably the trickiest relationships to show in a database. So, my first step in this article will be to explain what they are. Then I’ll move on to giving you several examples of many-to-many relationships, keeping them as close to real life as possible. Finally, I’ll use those examples to show you how to implement many-to-many relationships in a relational database.
Ready? Let’s get started.
Many-to-Many Relationship in Theory
A many-to-many (or M:N) relationship is one of the three database relationships. The other two are:
- One-to-one (1:1) relationships
- One-to-many (1:N) relationships
By definition, a many-to-many relationship is where more than one record in a table is related to more than one record in another table. Such a relationship can be tricky to represent in the database, so I’ll show you how to do it in the following example. You might also want to read about entities, attributes, and how to define them. I’ll use those concepts a lot, so reading the article won’t hurt.
Many-to-Many Relationship in Practice
Let’s move on to the three examples. I’ll show these many-to-many relationships in ER diagrams drawn in the Vertabelo Database Modeler.
Example 1: University Database
In this example, your task is to build a university database. You’ve just started, but you’re already stuck. You have to show the professors and the subjects they teach, but how will you do it?
Let me show you how to represent this relationship by first defining the entities. One should be the
professor entity, and the other is
subject. Let’s check if this could be a many-to-many relationship. One professor could teach one or many subjects, but one subject could also be taught by one or many professors. It seems it is an M:N relationship, so here’s how your logical model should look:
professor entity has the following attributes:
id: The professor’s ID; a primary identifier (PI).
first_name: The professor’s first name.
last_name: The professor’s last name.
subject entity has the attributes:
id: The subject’s ID; a primary identifier (PI).
subject_name: The subject name.
Many-to-many relationships are not ideal. If left as it is in the above example, the data would be duplicated. For instance, if there’s a professor that teaches six subjects, you would have him or her listed in the table six times, every time for a different subject. This is quite inefficient. So, how would you resolve this many-to-many relationship between these two entities? By introducing a junction table into your model. It will resolve the many-to-many relationship into multiple one-to-many relationships.
Let’s transpose this logical model to a physical data model and see what happens. First, the entities
subject will become tables, and their attributes will be the tables’ columns. It should look like this:
As you can see, there’s a new table called
professor_subject. It contains the following attributes:
professor_id: The professor’s ID, which references the
subject_id: The subject’s ID, which references the
professor_id is a foreign key to the table
professor. The same goes with the
subject_id; it’s a foreign key to the table
subject. At the same time, the pair
subject_id is the primary key for the table
subject_id together form a composite primary key (i.e. the primary key consists of two or more columns). This composite primary key ensures that a professor can be assigned to one subject one time. Each pair of values (
subject_id) can be in the table no more than once. The same goes for the subjects; each one can be assigned to one professor one time. The composite key ensures the uniqueness of the attribute combinations.
Let’s check that the junction table solves the many-to-many relationship. One professor can be allocated only once to the same subject. On the other hand, one subject can be assigned only once to the same professor. It seems that the junction table serves its purpose. That’s the first bit of good news!
The next piece of good news is that I didn’t have to draw this physical model all over again. There is a nice little trick provided by the Vertabelo Database Modeler that transforms a logical model into a physical one in four clicks. Here’s how to do it:
1.In your Documents, right-click on the model you want to make into a physical model. Choose the option “Generate physical model…”
2.Then you’ll see the dialogue box where you have to choose your target database engine. Select it (that’s your third click), and click “Generate Physical Model”.
3.After only four clicks, you’ll get the lovely physical database model I already showed you.
If building a data model from scratch is not your forte, here are some tips to make it easier.
Let’s move to the next example. It’s a little more complex, but don’t be afraid!
Example 2: Product Ordering Database
In this example, your task is to create a database that will help a company store information about their suppliers. The database will also contain info on all the products/services ordered from the suppliers. The logical data model could look something like this:
Once again, we have two entities:
supplier entity, there are four attributes:
id: The supplier’s ID; a primary identifier (PI).
supplier_name: The supplier’s name.
supplier_address: The supplier’s address.
supplier_country: The country where the supplier is located.
The attributes in the
product entity are as follows:
id: The product’s ID; a primary identifier (PI).
product_name: The product’s name.
product_description: The product’s description.
price_per_unit: The product’s price per unit.
The relationship between those two entities is again many-to-many. One or many products can be ordered from one supplier. At the same time, the company can order the same product from many suppliers, e.g. services from different legal firms, tires from different manufacturers, etc. How would this logical model look when transformed into a relational database model? Like this:
Once again, instead of many-to-many, there’s a new table that’s automatically been named
supplier_product. It has only two attributes:
supplier_id: References the id column in the
product_id: References the id column in the table
Again, the pair
product_id is the primary key of the table. However, this might not be enough! If the task is to create a database that will record orders from suppliers, it would be better to expand the table
supplier_product a bit, as I’ve done below:
It looks much better now! First of all, I changed the table’s name to something more descriptive; it’s now named
order. I’ve also added several new attributes to the table. It consists of the following:
order_id: The ID of this order from the supplier and the table’s primary key (PK).
supplier_id: The ID of the supplier; references the table
product_id: The ID of the product ordered; references the table
order_date: The date of the order.
quantity: The number of items ordered.
total_price: The total value of the ordered products.
status: The status of the order.
Remember that there are two possibilities when creating a junction table. One is that it contains only foreign keys that reference other tables, which happens often enough. However, sometimes the junction table becomes its own entity, as in this example where it also contains other attributes. You should always adapt the model to your needs.
If you want to practice a bit more on a similar example, see this article.
Now that you’ve become so good at this, let’s take a look at one more example!
Example 3: Book Publisher Database
In this example, you’re in the publishing business and you need to maintain a record of the books you’ve published. Many people are involved in producing a book, so you also want to have a record of these people and their roles. The logical model could look something like this:
This time, there are three entities:
book entity contains these attributes:
isbn: The International Standard Book Number, a primary identifier (PI) used for books.
title: The title of the book.
issue: The issue (i.e. edition) of the book (e.g. first printing, first edition, etc.).
date: The date of the issue.
The next entity is
id:The staff member’s unique ID; a primary identifier (PI).
first_name: The staff member’s first name.
last_name: The staff member’s last name.
Between these two entities, there’s a many-to-many relationship. Let’s check the logic. One staff member can work on one or many books. One book can be handled by one person (well, hardly) or by many people. It seems the relationship logic works!
On to the third entity,
role! It consists of:
id: The ID of the role; a primary identifier (PI).
role_name: The name of the role.
role_description: A description of that role.
Again, there is a many-to-many relationship between the entities
role. Logic says that one staff member can fill one or many roles when working on a book and that one role can be performed by one or many staff members. When I say role, I mean something like author, co-author, editor, proofreader, translator, illustrator, etc. For instance, the author of one book can also be an illustrator on another book, translator on a third, and proofreader on a fourth.
This example seems even more complicated than the first two. Until now, there were only two tables in the logical model. How will the physical model look in this case? Like this:
Does that look scary? Well, maybe a little bit. What happened here is that you were introduced to ternary relationships without knowing it. A ternary relationship is when three entities participate in the relationship, as in this example. Here, the junction table again has a composite primary key that is made up of foreign keys. This time, however, the primary key consists of three columns, not two.
book is important here; it’s the starting point from which the creators of the book have to be determined. When I say creators, I mean the staff members who participated in that book as well as their roles in that particular book.
Next, let’s analyze the junction table
book_creators. It has three attributes:
book_isbn: The ISBN of the book; references the
staff_id: The ID of the staff member; references the
role_id: The ID of the role; references the
The primary key of the table is the unique combination of the attributes
By creating this junction table, you’ve solved the many-to-many relationship, which is enough to declare this task finished!
What Are Your Thoughts on Many-to-Many Relationships?
In these three examples, I’ve tried to show you what many-to-many relationships are in a logical database model. We’ve also discussed how to approach your physical data model. You’ve learned that many-to-many relationships in relational databases can be solved by implementing a junction table. And finally, we also demonstrated that you don’t have to draw logical and physical models separately. The Vertabelo Database Modeler can help you generate a physical model from the logical one, sometimes without any additional tweaks.